Q es peor?

[Zeithgeist]

roger.... HEAD!!

[EpoX]

otro gay en potencia.. bienvenido!

no seas asi zeith todavia se esta recuperando de el tiro en la cien,el otro en las bolas , despues q lo agarraron un grupo de 50 100 vagos y lo mataron a piñas , con palos , achas y espadas ...xD

[Zeithgeist]

QUE VA.... si dice q prefiere eso q un gay... pero si elige al gay, como de seguro haria, no le pegan boloh.. esta con buena salud, el muchacho

[sirsacachispas]

jajajja Raizor esto es el sigle 21 maaaan

[Raizor]

jajajja Raizor esto es el sigle 21 maaaan

Y que mierda me importa a mi.

Saludos.

[EpoX]

Y que mierda me importa a mi.

Saludos.

se saca el dedo y lo huele

[Zeithgeist]

ojito a las putedas, cheeee.... no te pongas histerica, amorcito, ya te voy a presentar un papirucho....

[Zeithgeist]

se saca el dedo y lo huele

NOOOOOOOOOOO JAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJ

[Kaervas]

Homophobes Are Gay!

Press release, The American Psychological Association

Aug. 1996

WASHINGTON -- Researchers at the University of Georgia conducted an experiment involving 35 homophobic men and 29 nonhomophobic men as measured by the Index of Homophobia scale. All the participants selected for the study described themselves as exclusively heterosexual both in terms of sexual arousal and experience.

Each participant was exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of heterosexual, male homosexual and lesbian videotapes (but not necessarily in that order). Their degree of sexual arousal was measured by penile plethysmography, which precisely measures and records male tumescence.

Men in both groups were aroused by about the same degree by the video depicting heterosexual sexual behavior and by the video showing two women engaged in sexual behavior. The only significant difference in degree of arousal between the two groups occurred when they viewed the video depicting male homosexual sex: 'The homophobic men showed a significant increase in penile circumference to the male homosexual video, but the control [nonhomophobic] men did not.'

Broken down further, the measurements showed that while 66% of the nonhomophobic group showed no significant tumescence while watching the male homosexual video, only 20% of the homophobic men showed little or no evidence of arousal. Similarly, while 24% of the nonhomophobic men showed definite tumescence while watching the homosexual video, 54% of the homophobic men did.
Does this get you hot?

When asked to give their own subjective assessment of the degree to which they were aroused by watching each of the three videos, men in both groups gave answers that tracked fairly closely with the results of the objective physiological measurement, with one exception: the homophobic men significantly underestimated their degree of arousal by the male homosexual video.

Do these findings mean, then, that homophobia in men is a reaction to repressed homosexual urges, as psychoanalysis theorizes?

[Raizor]

La seriedad de los miembros del staff o que trabajan en C3...

Saludos.